Icon
Icon

Blog Details

How to Write an Effective AI PRD: Checklist for AI Product Managers

January 05, 2026

By

Everawe Labs

Highlighted report page among piles of paperwork
Highlighted report page among piles of paperwork
Highlighted report page among piles of paperwork

In traditional internet product development, a PRD ensures predictable behavior by detailing processes, use cases, and interfaces. However, in the AI era, the inherent uncertainty of models makes this approach ineffective. Product managers must shift from "locking processes" to "defining frameworks": specifying behaviors that must be stable, areas allowing flexibility, and evaluation criteria. Delegate execution to the model while retaining control over decisions and error-handling to ensure the PRD's guidance and reliability.

Avoiding the "Intelligent" Trap: Practical Implementation of Embedded AI

Embedded AI (such as smart summaries or automatic recommendations) is a common starting point, but many PMs use vague terms like "intelligent generation" or "automatic optimization," leading to team confusion and patchwork fixes during development. To avoid this, break down tasks into highly specific steps: instead of "help users understand content," specify "extract core themes from input text, generate 2-3 bullet point key points + a summary no longer than 50 words."

Next, scrutinize data like an editor: in the PRD, list the fields, context, and historical records fed to the model, and evaluate their reliability and structure. Crucially, predefined "risk preferences" for users—when data is insufficient, opt for a conservative output like "unable to generate" or an aggressive one like "based on limited data, for reference only." This determines product usability and user trust.

Case: A short-video platform's "smart clip summary" feature initially produced irrelevant content, prompting user complaints about "off-topic summaries." The team redefined the task in the PRD as: "Extract core events from the first 30% of the video, generate a title no longer than 15 words + 3 bullet points, each with corresponding video timestamps." The fallback strategy: if confidence is below 0.7, return "Unable to generate high-quality summary; suggest watching the original video." After launch, summary satisfaction rose from 61% to 87%, and average playtime increased by 9% as users trusted the system more.

From Drawing Processes to "Training People": Rethinking Agent-Type AI

Agent-type AI (like chatbots or smart assistants) is more complex—don't rush into system architecture diagrams. First, consider its role in the business. The PRD should act like an "employee onboarding manual," clearly defining authority boundaries: which issues must be directly answered, which only suggested, which require human review, and which principles to prioritize in gray areas.

Avoid technical jargon like "long-short term memory"; use business language to define what it can "see" and "remember" for how long. For example, can it reference a user's return record from a year ago? These decisions directly impact privacy risks and user trust. Only when permissions, obligations, and paths are clearly documented will the agent's behavior remain consistent across model updates.

Case: An e-commerce AI customer service agent initially had "unlimited memory" access, leading it to say during a new order query, "Your return last year was due to oversized fit; I'll recommend a larger size this time," resulting in complaints and a 31% negative feedback rate. The team redefined: access only recent 90-day records; require user consent for historical references (e.g., "Do you need me to refer to your previous return records?"); prohibit mentioning sensitive info without authorization.

Redefining "Qualified": Systematic Evaluation and User Experience

Refer to my previous share on "AI Product Evaluation Framework" In AI products, the evaluation section goes beyond simple "pass/fail" because experiences often fall between "slightly better" and "slightly worse." You must use evaluation sets (Golden Sets) and quantitative metrics to measure overall performance. For instance, in designing an AI customer service, specify in the PRD: expect the first version's first-query resolution rate to match a certain percentage of human levels, with negative feedback not exceeding a threshold, and explain the rationale.

To enable continuous AI evolution, the PRD must include a closed-loop UX feedback system. Beyond explicit feedback like likes, track implicit behaviors such as adoption rates or secondary edit rates. These data points are not just metrics but key fuel for subsequent model fine-tuning.

——

In the AI product era, many PMs have tried using LLMs to write PRDs. But competent PMs treat models as "brainstorming tools"—first think through problem definitions, boundary settings, and evaluation standards yourself, then use them for polishing. AI product success often hinges on edge cases: extreme users, gray scenarios, data gaps. These are your real battlegrounds.


Appendix: AI PRD Checklist

Layer 1: Core Foundations (Mandatory for All AI Products)
This layer ensures AI is a true business solution.
✅ Product Goals and KPI Definitions: Clearly state the AI product's business objectives, user pain points, and overall KPIs (e.g., increase user retention by 20%). Why it matters: Ensures AI isn't just a tech gimmick but serves business needs. Example: Goal: "Reduce manual input time by 30%"; KPI: "Average interaction time < 2 minutes."
✅ User Scenarios and Use Case Breakdown: List core user scenarios, triggers, and expected outputs. Distinguish must-be-stable behaviors vs. flexible ones, and define flexibility boundaries (e.g., output length ±20%). Why it matters: AI's uncertainty requires avoiding vague descriptions. Example: Table format: Scenario | Input | Output Template | Stable/Flexible.
✅ Input Data List and Quality Assessment: Detail model inputs' fields, sources, context, historical records, and evaluate reliability (structure, noise rate, update frequency). Why it matters: Garbage in equals garbage out; early data issues save development costs. Example: Field list: User ID (required), Query Text (string, max 500 words), Historical Dialogues (last 5 rounds).
✅ Output Format and Constraints: Define structure, length, tone, and prohibited content (e.g., avoid sensitive words). Why it matters: Uniform outputs improve user experience and reduce post-processing. Example: Output must be JSON: {"summary": "string", "points": ["bullet1", "bullet2"]}.
Layer 2: Scenario Deep Dive (Select Based on Product Type)
Tailor to different AI implementations to mitigate specific technical risks.
Embedded AI Specific (e.g., Summaries, Recommendation Systems)
✅ Task Atomic Breakdown: Break "intelligent" tasks into concrete steps, removing vague adjectives. Why it matters: Facilitates engineering and testing, avoids team misunderstandings. Example: Not "smart summary," but "Extract core themes → Generate 2-3 points → Synthesize 50-word summary."
✅ Fallback and Error-Handling Strategies: Define behaviors for insufficient data/low confidence (conservative: reject generation; aggressive: mark "for reference only"; hybrid: ask for more input). Why it matters: Handles AI's "unknowns" to maintain user trust. Example: Confidence <0.7: Return "Insufficient info; can't generate accurate summary. Provide more details."
✅ Bias and Fairness Checks: Assess potential biases in inputs/outputs (e.g., gender, race) and define mitigation measures. Why it matters: Prevents ethical risks, especially in recommendations. Example: Train on diverse datasets; enforce balanced representation in outputs.
Agent-Type AI Specific (e.g., Chatbots, Smart Assistants)
✅ Authority Boundary Table: Clearly define agent's scope: must execute/only suggest/prohibited/requires review. Why it matters: Prevents overreach leading to legal or user issues. Example: Table: Operation | Permission | Conditions (e.g., "Transfers >$1000 require human review").
✅ Memory and State Management: Define visible data range, memory duration, and privacy filters. Why it matters: Balances personalization with privacy, avoids "over-memory" leaks. Example: Retain only 90-day data; sensitive info (e.g., payments) requires user consent.
✅ Multi-Turn Interaction Paths: Map dialogue flows, including branches, loops, and exits. Why it matters: Agents can loop endlessly; clear paths are essential. Example: Flowchart: User Query → Clarify → Suggest Output → Confirm/Iterate.
✅ External Tool Integration: List callable APIs/tools, with conditions and safeguards. Why it matters: Enhances functionality but controls risks (e.g., API rate limits). Example: Weather API only for location queries; on failure: "Network issue; try later."
Layer 3: Evaluation and Evolution (Growth Engine)
AI launch is just the start; this ensures iterative capabilities.
✅ Evaluation Metrics Combination: Define quantitative indicators like accuracy, recall, first-query resolution, negative feedback, adoption, secondary edit, and human intervention rates. Include targets and rationales. Why it matters: Shifts from "better/worse" to data-driven. Example: First-query resolution ≥75% (based on historical human levels to prevent user churn).
✅ Golden Set and Test Sets: Prepare offline evaluation sets (100-1000 labeled samples) and online A/B test plans. Why it matters: Simulates real scenarios for model robustness. Example: Golden Set covers edge cases like noisy input or multilingual.
✅ Feedback Closed-Loop Mechanism: Design explicit (likes/feedback buttons) and implicit (behavior logs) collection, and explain use for model fine-tuning. Why it matters: AI needs ongoing learning; loops are key to iteration. Example: Negative feedback >10% triggers auto-fine-tuning; monthly log reviews adjust thresholds.
✅ Version Iteration Plan: Define MVP metrics, subsequent roadmap, and post-launch monitoring. Why it matters: AI isn't one-and-done; plan for evolution. Example: V1: Basic features; V2: Add multimodal inputs.
Layer 4: Compliance and Operations (Safety Baseline)
This ensures stable operation at scale.
✅ Privacy and Data Compliance: List GDPR/HIPAA requirements, define anonymization and user consent. Why it matters: Avoids fines and reputational damage. Example: Encrypt all user data; offer "data deletion" options.
✅ Security and Robustness: Assess adversarial attacks (e.g., prompt injection), hallucinations, and define protections (e.g., input filters). Why it matters: AI is vulnerable; build in safeguards. Example: Ban harmful outputs; include "red team testing."
✅ Ethics and Bias Audits: Plan third-party or internal reviews. Why it matters: Builds trustworthy AI, enhances brand. Example: Quarterly audits for output diversity, ensuring no discrimination.
✅ Tech Stack and Dependencies: List model versions, frameworks (e.g., Hugging Face), deployment environments, and monitoring tools. Why it matters: Eases engineering onboarding, reduces integration issues. Example: Model: GPT-4o; Monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana.
✅ Cross-Team Collaboration Points: Define handoffs with engineering, design, and legal teams. Why it matters: PRD isn't isolated; needs full-chain coordination. Example: Engineering handles deployment; Legal reviews compliance.
✅ Cost Estimation and Optimization: Assess API call costs, compute resources, and optimization strategies. Why it matters: AI is resource-intensive; control budgets. Example: Single query cost <$0.01; Use caching to reduce repeats.
✅ Post-Launch Monitoring and Rollback: Define real-time metrics (e.g., latency >500ms alerts) and rollback plans. Why it matters: Quick issue response minimizes impact. Example: Sentry for error monitoring; Switch to manual mode on severe issues.

Fast Take

Discover how AI product teams are redefining PRDs for a world where outcomes aren’t always predictable. Learn the mindset shift that turns messy model behavior into reliable user value. If you build AI products, you’ll want these ideas in your toolkit.

Share Now
Facebook
Twitter
Linkdin